Jak and Daxter Wiki
Register
Advertisement
Shortcuts:
J&D:FA

Featured articles (Featured article) are the best articles on the Jak and Daxter Wiki, as determined by an exhaustive peer-review process. Prospective featured articles are scrutinized against the featured article criteria, then promoted or declined according to consensus.

The goal of this project is to produce and recognize exemplary articles, ideally for the benefit of other articles, and to spotlight the best the wiki has to offer. To that end, the lede sections of featured articles are displayed on the Main Page (see here). The featured article criteria also describe an overall ideal standard for the wiki, and their application should not be viewed as limited to the scope of this project.

There are 2 featured articles out of the 912 articles on the Jak and Daxter Wiki. Featured articles that no longer meet community standards may be demoted according to consensus.

Nomination process[]

To nominate an article for featured status, start a new section on the article's talk page titled "Featured article nomination". Provide a brief defense of the article's measure to the criteria, then sign the post. The assessment process involves reviewers providing constructive feedback and allowing sufficient time for subsequent revisions. Once all concerns have been addressed, reviewers and other editors should clearly indicate their support of or opposition to the article's promotion.

The promotion process involves a recognition and declaration of consensus, then adding the {{FA}} template to the top of the article. Old featured articles that no longer uphold the current featured article standard can also be demoted, according to consensus.

Featured article criteria[]

A featured article is:

  1. well written.
    1. The prose is lucid and engaging; the writing succinct but precise.
    2. The grammar and punctuation are of a professional standard.
  2. of encyclopedic merit.
    1. The material is verifiable against inline citations to reliable sources.
    2. The article is well researched, authoritative, and has an interesting topic.
    3. The article is comprehensive but focused, providing ample context but not digressing from its subject.
  3. compliant with community standards.
    1. It complies most importantly with Verifiability and Notability.
    2. It is an exemplary reflection of the Manual of Style and File use guidelines.
    3. It is consistent with any firmly established writing, organization, and formatting conventions.
Advertisement